Product Liability Lawsuits in Florida – And How to Hire an Attorney

How to file claims for defective products and finding the right lawyer to help

Product liability lawsuits, also known as defective product lawsuits, are long, messy and complicated. That is because it takes a lot of research to figure out exactly which manufacturer created which part of the product that actually injured you. It is a large lesson in supply chain management, and it takes a lot of resources. Learn more and reach out to a Florida lawyer right here.

Maybe it was a swing set you bought for your children. Perhaps it was a toaster oven that you purchased for your wife on Valentine’s Day (so thoughtful, Mr. Romance!). Sometimes products just do not operate the way they were intended to – and that swing set has a seat that snaps, or the toaster oven catches on fire.

This is an area of law called “defective products,” also known by its alias, “products liability.”

This section of law can get confusing because it spiders off into three separate categories, and much of its depends on the manufacturer’s state of mind when the product was created or designed. It also examines the theory of supply chain management, which can stretch very far back through multiple companies, and across various states and countries – depending on how many different companies provided parts for the actual end product.

Let’s take a look at Florida in particular.

Products liability under Florida law

In Florida, courts use one of two theories to analyze what happened in a defective product case: a negligence theory, or a product liability theory. The latter can be referred to as “strict products liability,” which means that the person’s intent does not matter, as long as the plaintiff can prove that the product was, in fact, defective. These theories might overlap or bleed together in certain cases, but for the most part they are fairly demarcated. Florida usually follows the strict liability theory.

We discussed negligence in this article. Products liability, on the other hand, tends to fall into one of three categories, each of which takes the manufacturer’s conduct (or lack thereof) into account.